Search for: "Williams v. United States Marshal" Results 1 - 20 of 473
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2008, 9:00 pm by Andrew Sather
Secretary of State, 1800-1801Appointed Chief justice of the United States, February 4, 1801Famous Cases:Marbury v. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 7:09 am by Andrew Hamm
United States, in which Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes’ dissent in defense of free speech has proven more powerful and lasting than the original holding. [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
President John Adams offered this appraisal of Marshall’s impact: “My gift of John Marshall to the people of the United States was the proudest act of my life. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
”[1] An influential Virginia judge and a professor of law at the College of William and Mary, St. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 11:24 am by Nicholas Mosvick
In a bid to strengthen Federalist power, President Adams appointed Secretary of State John Marshall to be Chief Justice of the United States. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 8:42 am
Tushnet, one of the pre-eminent constitutional scholars in the United States. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 3:11 am by NCC Staff
Brennan later was serving on the New Jersey state Supreme Court when President Dwight Eisenhower nominated him to the United States Supreme Court as a recess appointment. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 2:50 pm by Josh Blackman
"He's the most important Supreme Court justice, certainly of the first 100 years of the United States," Finkelman said. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 12:43 pm by Ronald Collins
Thus, he joined a dissent by Chief Justice Melville Fuller in United States v. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 12:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
The Collection of the Supreme Court of the United States (Artist: Gardener Cox) The Oyez site reports that Congressional leaders, especially those from the South, were worried about the potential of a liberal justice being appointed to the Court following the landmark decision in Brown v. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 4:30 am by Josh Blackman
" As Chief Justice Marshall later explained, if any part of an Act is "unconstitutional, the provisions of that part may be disregarded while full effect will be given to such as are not repugnant to the constitution of the United States. [read post]